A Growing ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Prosperity and Hardship Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in England.
Within a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents occupy properties only several yards from their more affluent counterparts in the adjacent Scartho village. One 1.8-metre-high barricade physically separates the two communities in the town of Grimsby, sealing off roads and walkways that previously connected them.
“This is the posh-poor divide,” said Serenity Colley, 37. “It has been there for as long as I’ve known. I doubt they’ll bring it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
A Stark National Picture
Analysis of government figures shows how deep inequality can run, at times across nothing more than a short distance of tarmac, a line of hedges or a barrier. Years of budget cuts and underinvestment have led to a situation where a majority of councils now contain a locality classified as one of the most deprived in the nation.
This spread of poverty has coincided with a sharp rise in the quantity of locations where disadvantaged and well-off residents end up living side by side. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest areas adjoined one of the least deprived. That figure rose to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Does More Than Separate Land
At this Lincolnshire site, the divide is the most pronounced in the country and starkly apparent. The barrier transcends being just a metaphorical division; it creates very real problems for everyday life.
- School runs that ought to take 15-20 minutes become an hour-long detour.
- Access to important services like grocery stores, schools and care homes is made more difficult.
- The site often sees antisocial behaviour, with reports of rubbish being thrown over the wall and related problems.
“People strive to have a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one local, gesturing towards the rusted barricade.
Community Spirit Amidst Hardship
At a local community centre, workers emphasise that need does not recognise postcodes. “Your postcode is not a reliable indicator of your personal struggles,” said chief executive Tracey Good.
Regardless of ranking in the lowest 10% for income, employment, education, health and crime, the estate boasts a strong sense and sense of togetherness among its residents. By contrast, the neighbouring area ranks among the most prosperous 10% overall.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This pattern is repeated nationally. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in the country. It is closely bordered by large houses built in the early 2000s that sit in the wealthiest tenth for job prospects and quality of surroundings.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s more community,” said a long-term resident, aged 63. “It’s likely many people over there don’t even speak to each other.”
The financial divide is evident: an typical family home costs about £275,000 on the estate, while across the divide equivalent homes go for about £410,000.
Locals describe a tangible feeling of being overlooked. “This part of the community gets ignored,” stated resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our amenities have gradually disappeared, and the majority of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The rise in these ‘inequality borders’ paints a portrait of an ever more divided England, where prosperity and need are frequently awkwardly in close proximity.