🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and less expensive approach for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.