🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing damages totaling $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding proposals to use immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on reports in Russian state media, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union officials have argued that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has called any use of the funds as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Wider Implications

In comments seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "It also sends a powerful signal that when you do all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."